On Violence

Violence. What are my feelings about violence? What do I know about violence? This is such a difficult concept to grapple with, I almost do not know where to start. Perhaps one should begin with a basic definition of violence. As I see it, violence is the use of physical force upon another so as to pursue one’s own ends in the face of conflict. But this definition begs the question: does it logically follow that violence should be chosen as a means for solving disputes? As many have noted on this blog, violence breeds violence. Violence breeds hate. When violence is alive on a large scale, this hate can be passed on to infect younger generations.
The thing that I find most revolting about violence is that it is cowardly. Rhetoric and propaganda try to teach us otherwise. Growing up we learn of the strength and courage of the soldiers and warriors of history. The truth of the matter is this: violence is the easy way out. My personal belief is that it takes more strength to oppose violence that it does to propagate it. Given the situation, anyone can force his or her will upon another. Nonviolence is difficult yet essential if humanity wishes to hold itself to some standard of respect and dignity.
Now some may refute this belief citing that violence is sometimes needed for self-defense or for the defense of the helpless. There may be some merit in this objection. Every person should be safe in one’s own home and have the right to protect his or her family. However, imagine a world were the word violence has lost its meaning. Whenever the issue arises, we could all make it our job to convince just one person that nonviolence is the way. Then, if those people go out and do the same, think about the domino effect of peace that could follow. As fast as violence spreads, so too does peace. It is our job as human people to choose the path that we feel is best for all.

“Peace is the only battle worth waging.”

-Albert Camus